Why “Wire wrapping” is a Traditional Metalsmithing Technique

What, exactly, are “traditional metalsmithing techniques”?

I’ve tried to figure it out because I see this phrase all over the place.  So far, the only thing I’ve managed to determine is that it’s a blanket term for an assumed, but ill-defined, set of construction methods a skilled metalworker must know how to use.

A couple of months ago I opened up an Artfire Shop.  Like “street teams” on Etsy, Artfire encourages craftspeople to band together and form “guilds” according to their specialties.  I applied to join a Metalsmiths Guild, and was rejected.  The reason given:  “All members must have metalsmithed pieces listed live in their Pro Studio, and those metalsmithed pieces must make the majority of the items listed in their Studio, because our focus here is Metalsmithing.  Your studio is basically filled with beautiful wire wrapped pieces at this time.”

When I went to look at the Guild Master’s shop, I discovered that about half of her available work was made of wire, much of it cold-worked.  The difference?  She was hammering it, as well as wrapping it.

There were several pieces of wirework on the Guild’s gallery page, and when I pointed this out to her, I got an indignant reply:  “…there is not a single wire wrapped piece displayed in the [Guild] photo gallery. Not one piece. (except for one of my copper Hearts which has a few soldered components, as well as a wire ”stitching” detail around the heart, but that is not what we”d call ”wire wrapping” per say)”

She went on:  “So, I”m really not sure where you saw this when you say “I note that several of your members have wireworked pieces included in the guild gallery.” – you were not looking at the [Guild] gallery. I can guarantee you that.”

I didn’t say wire wrapped, I said wireworked, and there were definitely several pieces in the Guild’s gallery.  Once again, I was being slapped with dismissive terminology.

She sounded positively offended at the insinuation that any cold-joined wire jewellery might be included.  “For the [Guild], we ask that our members focus on pieces geared towards ”traditional” metalsmithing techniques… ”

In the first essay of this series, I established that there are three major forms of metalworking:  sheet, cast and wire.  As the exchange with my ArtFire correspondent shows, there are divergent opinions about what construction methods are needed in order to actually call oneself a metalsmith.  So, let’s start with a definition:

Met-al-smith, noun

∙ an artist or craftsman who works with metal, esp. in making sculptures, jewelry, etc. [1. YourDictionary.com/metalsmith]
∙ a person skilled in metalworking [2. Merriam Webster]

Let’s also clarify what “traditional” means:

Traditional, adjective

1. based on customs usually handed down from a previous generation <a traditional Passover meal at his grandparents’ house>
2.  tending to favor established ideas, conditions, or institutions <a family that is very traditional when it comes to institutions like marriage>[3. Merriam Webster]

Wire jewellery – and in particular cold-joined wire jewellery – has a very long history, as evidenced by pieces in the collection of the British Museum, here, here, here, here, here and here and in the Victoria & Albert Museum here, here, here and here.  In fact, this brooch dating from the Middle Bronze Age is among the oldest known pieces of classical cold-working.

Doing a search online for “wire wrapping” brings up all kinds of references to electrical equipment. I was surprised to find only one definition of “wire wrap jewellery”:

Wire wrap jewellery is a type of design and method of hand jewellery fabrication. [4. WordIQ.com] (emphasis mine)

Hand fabricated jewellery is built from constructed and assembled pieces, which have been soldered or cold-joined. It can use sheet, wire, found objects, you name it.  Hand fabricated wire jewellery can incorporate a wide variety of different cold-joining methods such as weaving, coiling, seizing, stitching and lashing.

The single element which determines whether a piece of cold-joined wire jewellery is called “wire wrapping” is the presence of binding.

Tim McCreight lists wire “wrapping” second after “tabs” in Chapter 5 “Joining” of The Complete Metalsmith.  He writes:  “It’s hard to get much simpler than binding elements together with wire.  Countless examples can be found in farm tools, kitchen utensils and ethnic jewelry from around the world.”  [4. McCreight, Tim. The Complete Metalsmith, (Portland: Brynmorgan Press Inc., 2004), ISBN 1-929565-05-4, pg. 102] (emphasis mine)

In fact, he refers to “wire wrapping” as “The Original Cold Connection”. [5. McCreight, Tim. The Complete Metalsmith, (Portland: Brynmorgan Press Inc., 2004), ISBN 1-929565-05-4, pg. 221]

In other words, it’s a traditional metalsmithing technique.

<Previous Please Don’t Call Me a “Wirewrapper”

Please Don’t Call Me a “Wirewrapper”

A few weeks ago I was listening to Jay Whaley’s Blogtalkradio interview with Helen Goga, former editor and publisher of The Wire Artist Jeweller magazine.  One of the things that really struck me during the broadcast was the terminology each of them was using.   Without fail, Helen made reference to “wire jewelry” and “wire jewellers”, while Jay said “wirewrapping” and “wirewrappers”.

For the past fifteen years, I have been exploring various techniques for manipulating wire to create jewelry, both simple and complex.  From thick to thin, I’ve bent, linked, twisted, woven, hammered, fused, crocheted and knitted my way through many kilograms of metal.  The possibilities of what can be made using wire are virtually endless.  Much of my oeuvre has been created without the use of a torch.  This is a deliberate choice:  I enjoy the challenge of figuring out a design based on the constraint of working cold.

I am not a “wirewrapper”.  I *never* refer to myself using that term.  The reason is very simple:  For many, the term “wirewrapping” conjures up images of someone who is unskilled and not serious about their craft.  I’m neither, so when I talk to people about what I do, I tell them I am a professional artist/studio jeweller/metalsmith/instructor who makes jewelry out of wire.  People understand these terms and respond with an open mind.

Helen alluded to the same thing during the conversation with Jay.

Potential clients and metalsmiths alike turn off when they hear the word “wirewrapping”.  It’s like a kill switch.  Seriously, mention “wirewrapper” or “wrapping” and the conversation stops.  Dead.  It doesn’t matter that my work has been published in books and magazines, or that it’s been included in national and international exhibitions.  It. Just. Stops. Dead.

Oppi Untracht, in his book “Jewelry Concepts and Technology”, made reference to three major forms of metal used in jewelry:  sheet, cast, and wire.[1. 1. At the time, metal clay had not yet been invented, otherwise it would likely have been included as well.]  This book is considered by many in the craft to be the Bible of jewelry making.  He devoted 111 pages to “The Uses of Drawn or Extruded Flexible Filaments”.[2. 2. Untracht, Oppi. Jewelry Concepts and Technology, (New York:  Doubleday & Company, Inc.,  1985) ISBN: 0-385-04185-3, Contents ix.]

Of course, there are metalsmiths who produce work in sheet metal, metal clay, and cast metal that is unsophisticated, but for some reason, the harshest critique seems to be reserved for wirework, and especially for cold-worked wire.

Why?

For many years, and for most of this past year in particular, I’ve been pondering this question.  The answer is rather convoluted, and touches on many different areas, so I’m going to break it down into a series of essays that lay out what I see are the virtues and the vices of wire.

I’m going to look at wire jewelry through the eyes of the various communities with whom I interact:  the general public, who buy jewelery; the wireworking community, made up of professionals and hobbyists, who share my passion for this form of metalwork; the students, who want and need the best quality instruction in order to succeed in their own practice; and, the greater metalworking community against whose standards of excellence wirework is compared and judged.

Please feel free to join in by posting comments below and by sharing anything that resonates with you.

Next>  Why “Wire wrapping” is a Traditional Metalsmithing Technique

I have no shame, we all start somewhere…

As a follow-up to my rant, I thought I should post a photo of some of my earliest work.  When I’m teaching raw beginners, I always suggest that they should keep their first pieces, so that years from now they’ll be able to see how far they’ve come.  I have a box full of my early pieces.  Most are completely unsellable, and some are butt ugly, but I remember being so proud of them when they were first made.

DianneEarlyJewellery

Some years later, I was dating a accountant who collected Inuit and Native art, and had a taste for the finer things in life:  Cuban cigars, $50/shot whiskey and Angus beef.  He had a very discerning eye, and was very willing to tell me when the work I produced did not show “The Spark of Divine Madness”, as he called it.  His criticisms, though sometimes really hard to hear, helped me to gain an understanding of where I needed to improve.

Outside of a formalized education environment, there are very few opportunites to get truly constructive feedback.  It’s frustrating to submit your work to a show or a publication and have it rejected without any explanation.  It shakes the ego, and it’s hard not to question every aspect of what you do as a result.  Is my work no good, did I not take good photos, was my artist statement crap? What??

The International Guild of Wire Jewelry Artists recognized the need for this type of mentoring, and set up a special section on their message board specifically for honest critique.  It’s sometimes a challenge to suspend attachment to the piece being critiqued; it helps to know that the observations are made with open hearts in the true spirit of helping each other improve.  I’ve used it myself and gotten immensely valuable commentary.

Alot of the energy behind my rant stemmed from knowing the impact on newbies when they learn the proper foundation skills.  The ability to create quality workmanship results in a corresponding increase in confidence and self-esteem.

Because wirework is perceived as being easy to do, special attention needs to be given to helping the public and the makers understand the importance of learning the right skills the right way.  As the full-time students who took my class found out, working with wire can require a high degree of dexterity, even for “simple” projects.  Many of them found it much more challenging than they expected.

Several people who responded to the discussion on one of the forums asked for further information about wire control.  I’m in the process of working something up and will publish it when it’s ready.

Almost 15 years ago, I started with these bits.  They are my reminder that we all start somewhere. Where we end up depends on a combination of our own drive and the support of those around us.

(Thanks to George, wherever he is, and to Karen and Jennifer.  And special thanks to Jacqueline, who at age 5, crawled up on my lap, and while fiddling with the pendant on the leather cord above, said “Y’know, I knew I was going to like you the moment I met you.”  When asked why, she said quietly:  “Because you make great jewellery!”)

A Rant about Quality & Best Practices

Bang Head Here

For at least a decade now there has been a very concerted effort to bring wirework into the mainstream consciousness.  Many people have dedicated a lot of time and effort to raising the profile of wire – and specifically solderless wire – as a legitimate medium for fine craft.

Thanks to the efforts of these people, and the influence of the Internet, wire artists have been able to show their work, and to connect with each other to share their passion for this form of metalworking.

In recent months I’ve noticed a change in attitude even amongst seasoned metalsmiths.  Where previously wirework was written off as not worthy of consideration, I’m seeing it given more prominence.  For example, The Metal Arts Guild of Canada – the Canadian equivalent of SNAG – is currently featuring the work of Sarah Williamson on the front page of its website*.  Sarah incorporates a lot of Rainbow Wrapping into her pieces.  In MAGC’s recent exhibition, not only my work, but also the wirework of Tamara Kronis, Lissa Brunet and Gillian Batcher figured prominently.

I see genuine interest light up in the eyes of people who ask me what I do, instead of watching them turning away and copping an attitude of “Oh… you don’t make “real” jewellery.”

Unlike 10 years ago, information on making wire jewellery is easy to find.

All of these developments are very positive.

Anyone who has followed this blog for any length of time knows that I am committed to producing quality work.  Anyone who has taken a class with me, or who has bought one of my tutorials knows that my commitment to quality also extends to my teaching.  One of the most treasured compliments I’ve ever gotten came from a Professor at George Brown College who taught the full-time jewellery program’s first year courses.  She greeted me one day while I was setting up for my class, and said that she had “heard good things” about my course.  I’m very proud of the fact that several people who took my class enjoyed it so much that they went on the enroll in a full-time jewellery program.  It’s equally gratifying that students from the program have joined my class and showed openness to this alternative form of jewelry making.

So… it drives me crazy when I see self-styled “instructors” churning out tutorials that teach bad technique.  Worse still is when I see a publication which positions itself as an industry leader allowing bad technique to be showcased without making the slightest effort to ensure a reasonable quality of workmanship.  It makes me want to bang my head in utter frustration.

I happened to pass by a local newsstand yesterday, and decided to stop in to see if any of the magazines I regularly peruse  were in.  I flipped through the latest issue of Step-by-Step Wire Jewelry.  SbSWJ is the only magazine since the demise of The Wire Artist Jeweller to devote itself exclusively to wirework.  In all honesty, it can only be regarded as the poor cousin of the latter.  Certainly, the projects are more simplistic – most are geared towards beginners – but to some extent I can understand that.  There is a limit to the number of steps that can be included to make each project when you’re showcasing 10+ designs an issue.

One of the projects was a neckpiece, attractive enough and easy to make.  It used square wire, also not a problem.  Here’s what made my jaw drop:  the right half of the necklace was riddled with components where the wire had gone “off square“.  What that means is that the artist did not have control of her wire.

Square wire bent around something curved like round nose pliers or a ring mandrel has a tendency to want to turn on its edge.  As a result, what you see is the corner of the wire rather than the smooth surface.  Maintaining control of the wire is vital for ensuring that the finished product looks nice, otherwise you’ve wasted your effort.  Any artist that cannot control their wire has no business trying to teach others.  It’s a waste of the students’ time.

There are a bunch of issues I see here:

First, by allowing the photo of this project with its poor workmanship to be published, SbSWJ is telling the wire community that not paying attention to the details is okay.  IT’S NOT OKAY.  Historically, it’s the lack of attention to detail that has caused the greater metalsmithing community to dismiss wirework.  Publishing crappy workmanship undermines the efforts of all of the people trying to educate the public and raise the profile of the craft.  This is a huge deal to the people who do wirework professionally.

Some might argue that they’re not interested in doing it professionally, that they are only interested in making it for themselves or as gifts for friends and family.  Okay fine.  Learning to make a piece well makes it that much more special and treasured.  It’s worth the effort.  The magazine still has a responsibility to provide the best visuals and instructions for accomplishing that goal.

Some might argue that the magazine can only work with what they’re sent.

To this I say:  BULLSH*T

I’m the editor of a magazine that publishes three issues a year.  Yes, it is difficult to deal with images that are poor quality.  But here’s the thing:  when SbSWJ published my Ladder Pendant project in March 2005, they asked me to reshoot some of the images, because the quality wasn’t good enough for print.  It is up to the magazine to set the bar and that includes setting the bar for the editorial content.  A magazine that purports to teach should at the very least START with insisting on proper technique.  Anything less does not service the readership, and people will stop buying the magazine.  Wire control is one of the fundamental techniques and SbSWJ is failing in their mandate.  Subscribers should be writing to the magazine and DEMANDING better.

As an artist, it’s a huge deal to be published.  It’s a fabulous achievement.  I still remember the high I felt being published in a major magazine for the first time.  Your work is out there, getting attention, filed in the Library of Congress, available for people to read about 5, 10, 25, 50 years from now.  So.. why would you submit something that is less than absolutely perfect? Is this really how you want posterity to see you?

As an instructor, if you can show that your workmanship is of the highest quality, being published is a stellar marketing tool.  Your tutorials will be in demand.  You’ll have repeat customers.  You’ll make more money. It’s not just about making money though, it’s about mentoring.  People just starting out want the best information available.  They want to do well, and it is the instructor’s responsibility to help them take the baby steps that builds their confidence in their abilities.  Not everyone will be able to make a virtuoso piece, but if the instructor’s work is not much better than the beginner’s first efforts, there is no chance at all for the student to develop the necessary skills to even make the attempt.

Step by Step Wire Jewelry, in its writers guidelines, states that their readers are “active amateurs and practicing professionals”.  By publishing workmanship that is blatantly unprofessional, they are not doing themselves, their contributing artists or their readers any favours; in fact, they are actively damaging the larger wire jewellery community.  They have an opportunity to take a leadership role in fostering best practices for quality.  There is no excuse for not taking it.

* Disclosure:  I am currently a member of the MAGC Board of Directors, but I do not participate in choosing who gets featured on the front page of the website.